All times are UTC-06:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Windows for ARM
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2010 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:34 am
Posts: 130
Location: Bielefeld, FRG
Bloomberg reports MS is going to present Windows for ARM on next CES. No Ce, but full Windows.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-2 ... -show.html

Chance for ARM or thread? I am undecided yet, but rather tend to think it is a chance for ARM. It may break the x86 monopoly on "computers" (note the *quotes* around the word computers).


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Windows for ARM
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:20 am
Posts: 242
Quote:
Bloomberg reports MS is going to present Windows for ARM on next CES. No Ce, but full Windows.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-2 ... -show.html

Chance for ARM or thread? I am undecided yet, but rather tend to think it is a chance for ARM. It may break the x86 monopoly on "computers" (note the *quotes* around the word computers).
That's interesting. Can't be bad for the ARM architecture IMHO...


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 1066
Well, with ARM at least I had an excuse not to use Windows :-) And if Windows is not suited for tablets on x86, why do they think that it will change, when Windows is ported to ARM?
Anyway, it's a welcome addition, diversity is good.

_________________
CzP
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:08 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Germany
Maybe A9 and A15 a little bit more powerful than Atom? Also more battery life.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:40 am
Posts: 195
Location: Pinto, Madrid, Spain
Quote:
with ARM at least I had an excuse not to use Windows :-)
:lol:
Quote:
if Windows is not suited for tablets on x86, why do they think that it will change, when Windows is ported to ARM?
Good point but... What makes you think the same people who are broadly successful in the mobile ("WP7") and gaming scenario ("XBOX360"), won't be able to cope with something as dull as a tablet, whenever they want to step in?

If everyone else is able to do so, go figure the biggest software company all over. My bet is that they are holding their cards because of their responsability with the market.
Quote:
Anyway, it's a welcome addition, diversity is good.
Sure!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 429
Location: Secure Networks / Sweden
Quote:
Anyway, it's a welcome addition, diversity is good.
Now that and Microsoft are something I never thought I would
read in the same sentences!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 1066
Well, I treat Windows as one of many available operating systems. My primary OS is Linux, secondary is FreeBSD and sometimes I also boot Windows.

BTW: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/pres ... pport.mspx

So it's official, even if not immediate. AFAIK, Windows 8 is due to arrive in two years...

_________________
CzP
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 8:46 pm
Posts: 559
Location: Paris
it's not about A9 or whatever ARM chip some may think about... it's all about Nvidia's "Denver" project...

http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/nvid ... e-desktop/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:20 am
Posts: 242
Quote:
it's not about A9 or whatever ARM chip some may think about... it's all about Nvidia's "Denver" project...

http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/05/nvid ... e-desktop/
While "Denver" surely is a very interesting project since it's AFAIK the first pronounced ambition to take ARM into the Desktop, Server, Workstation and Super Computer segments, I don't for a moment think that "it's all about nVidia" for Microsoft.

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/pres ... pport.mspx

"At today’s announcement, Microsoft demonstrated the next version of Windows running on new SoC platforms from ... NVIDIA, Qualcomm and Texas Instruments on ARM architecture."

So it *already* runs on current and existing ARM CPU's from more than one manufacturer, and not just in a simple "experimental boot-up proof of technology" or such, but *really* supported:

"The technology demonstration included Windows client support across a range of scenarios, such as hardware-accelerated graphics and media playback, hardware-accelerated Web browsing with the latest Microsoft Internet Explorer, USB device support, printing and other features customers have come to expect from their computing experience. Microsoft Office running natively on ARM was also shown as a demonstration of the potential of Windows platform capabilities on ARM architecture."

I mean, once the support for the ARM platform is there, I see no reason to why chips from, say, Freescale would be excluded? Their future top of the line ARM CPU's are *also* moving into the desktop/server segments and will offer matching options (i.MX Roadmap), and so will the other ARM CPU manufacturers I suppose. And isn't it more about providing the various needed Windows drivers? How would that differ from other PC system and peripheral devices manufacturers currently in the Windows market?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Posts: 94
Location: Italy
In fact looking at the video ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKc_XGuvNIk
It's true...
Even if I don't like closed source, like Windows OS, is good that now we don't see only Intel, becouse I don't like uniformity, I like diversity, I don't like big concentration I like deregulation...

Windows OS is the minimum , but the applications?
Becouse Windows OS without application is too less...
In any case I don't use Windows from 10 years...

On Windows many applications are closed source, so every software house must remake... The old x86 application run in a sort of just in time compilation from x86 to ARM , like IBM POWERVM or Apple Rosetta ?

In any case this open again others possibilities even for the powerpc architecture... Becouse if Android OS and Gnu/linux grown up on Powerpc market , M$crosoft will remcopile even Windows, if you need it... :D




Quote:
I mean, once the support for the ARM platform is there, I see no reason to why chips from, say, Freescale would be excluded? Their future top of the line ARM CPU's are *also* moving into the desktop/server segments and will offer matching options (i.MX Roadmap), and so will the other ARM CPU manufacturers I suppose. And isn't it more about providing the various needed Windows drivers? How would that differ from other PC system and peripheral devices manufacturers currently in the Windows market?

_________________
http://deliriotecnologico.blogspot.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 1066
Quote:

I mean, once the support for the ARM platform is there, I see no reason to why chips from, say, Freescale would be excluded? Their future top of the line ARM CPU's are *also* moving into the desktop/server segments and will offer matching options (i.MX Roadmap), and so will the other ARM CPU manufacturers I suppose. And isn't it more about providing the various needed Windows drivers? How would that differ from other PC system and peripheral devices manufacturers currently in the Windows market?
I guess, those three are the most visible players in the mobile phone / tablet world. But Freescale is mentioned in another interesting news: http://www.osnews.com/story/24243/Googl ... rom_Chrome Google is moving towards open standards.

_________________
CzP
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 1066
And a Windows on ARM article by Freescale: http://blogs.freescale.com/2011/01/11/c ... id=NL_0211

I still have the mother board of my first PC. It had a 2Mhz CPU and 640k of RAM :-)

_________________
CzP
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:40 am
Posts: 195
Location: Pinto, Madrid, Spain
Quote:
a Windows on ARM article by Freescale
I love this phrase, as it defines both the goodness and badness of curent technology industry:
Quote:
Suddenly the market redefined itself along two usage modes: lean forward computing (content creation) and lean backward computing (content consumption). The predominance of consumption versus creation generated powerful momentum for these new devices
Quote:
I still have the mother board of my first PC. It had a 2Mhz CPU and 640k of RAM :-)
I beat you: I still have my VIC-20 somewhere, with its one megahertz 6502 and 5 KB of RAM ;-)


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC-06:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
PowerDeveloper.org: Copyright © 2004-2012, Genesi USA, Inc. The Power Architecture and Power.org wordmarks and the Power and Power.org logos and related marks are trademarks and service marks licensed by Power.org.
All other names and trademarks used are property of their respective owners. Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group