Power Developer
https://powerdeveloper.org/forums/

CRUX ARM on EfikaMX
https://powerdeveloper.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2017		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  acrux [ Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  CRUX ARM on EfikaMX
The CRUX ARM Team is now able to provide a full EfikaMX (i.MX515) support.

http://crux-arm.nu/SupportedDevices/EfikaMX-SmartTop
Author:  wschaub [ Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:44 am ]
Post subject: 
That's great news! I will be trying it out when I have some time and an SD card to spare. have you tried it on the smartbook or just the smart top?
Author:  takemehomegrandma [ Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: CRUX ARM on EfikaMX
Quote:
The CRUX ARM Team is now able to provide a full EfikaMX (i.MX515) support.

http://crux-arm.nu/SupportedDevices/EfikaMX-SmartTop
Interesting! :-)

But please define "full"? Like complete HW acceleration?
Author:  acrux [ Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: CRUX ARM on EfikaMX
Quote:
Quote:
The CRUX ARM Team is now able to provide a full EfikaMX (i.MX515) support.

http://crux-arm.nu/SupportedDevices/EfikaMX-SmartTop
Interesting! :-)

But please define "full"? Like complete HW acceleration?
no, sorry. There isn't yet included a specific xorg driver.
Author:  pitillo [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 2:29 am ]
Post subject: 
There are some ports which should add imx xorg driver support now.

http://crux-arm.nu/gitweb?p=ports/efikamx.git;a=summary

All kind of feedback is welcome. They are only tested using a vnc connection and seem to work right, but soon they will be tested in a 42" lcd display (smarttop tests)

We need to deploy a newer test release which adds preprocessor symbols for gcc 4.5.2 (used in the next 2.7 release, for newer ones we should put hands on hardfp together with acrux's work)
Author:  acrux [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 9:16 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
There are some ports which should add imx xorg driver support now.

http://crux-arm.nu/gitweb?p=ports/efikamx.git;a=summary

All kind of feedback is welcome. They are only tested using a vnc connection and seem to work right, but soon they will be tested in a 42" lcd display (smarttop tests)

We need to deploy a newer test release which adds preprocessor symbols for gcc 4.5.2 (used in the next 2.7 release, for newer ones we should put hands on hardfp together with acrux's work)
you're doing an amazing job, thank You!
Author:  steev [ Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:25 pm ]
Post subject: 
Just one minor nitpick, I'm not extremely familiar with CRUX, but how do you handle licensing? Freescale have said that they don't mind people mirroring the tarballs, but you MUST show the Freescale EULA to users and they have to accept it. I can't see anything in the packages about accepting the license.
Author:  pitillo [ Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:00 am ]
Post subject: 
Hello Stephen,
thank you very much for your work and your reply to this thread.
I didn't know about that licensing problem that could be related to ports. Those aren't packages (CRUX is source oriented), these are the ports to build the packages. They pick source tarballs from the remote sites (they are shown in the source= header in the Pkgfiles). We don't host any source or packages (related to closed video driver) but if building ports can be a problem with licenses, we'll remove them.
I hope you can confirm this like a problem to remove all this work as fast as possible.
Regards, Victor.
Author:  steev [ Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:44 am ]
Post subject: 
As long as there is some way to show the Freescale EULA or make sure they accept it(in Gentoo we have a LICENSES variable, alternatively having the user download the files and put them in place manually) there shouldn't be any issues; I'm not a lawyer though, that's just what I was told when I asked wrt splitting out the packages for users to make it easier to install.
Author:  pitillo [ Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
Thank you again for this explanation Stephen. We'll change al those ports to let users get the sources theirselves to build them.
Author:  acrux [ Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:56 am ]
Post subject: 
well, a README file it's enough, imho.
If the end user does agree then he can choose to download the binary if available from the vendor.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-06:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/