All times are UTC-06:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:08 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Germany
Quote:
"Not that anybody on this thread gives a damn ... but I got an interesting email today from a developer who has a MP8641D dev kit. I have ars testbench 2.0 data now for MPC8641D, at 1.8 Ghz. On almost everything it is outrunning the dual (not dualcore) 1.8 970. On branchy scalar integer tests and on pseudo-random access tasks it is killing the 970. The bench doesn't directly measure latency, but the memory controller must be good and the bench numbers look "opteronish" in the way they scale with task footprint and from single-thread to dual. On latency-dependent dual-thread tasks significantly larger than Core1 caches ... it's beating core1 handily.

Single-thread FP is well down from 970 and moreso from Core1, no surprise.

It's a very potent altivec machine... beats everything except the dual-dual 970MPs running four threads. However most of the altivec in the testbench is well-optimized "
Source: ArsTechnica Forum

Just for interest ;-)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:08 pm 
Offline
Genesi

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 1422
The 8641D has promise. The board is big, but the chip looks good. We hope Freescale management starts to take an interest in altivec again!

R&B :)

_________________
http://bbrv.blogspot.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:08 am
Posts: 50
Location: France
And what about a Pegasos with this state of the art processor ?

Just in order to get a model between the "quad monster" and the actuel Peg ?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 111
Imho the PWRficient holds more promise - if P.A. Semi can get it to market without unforeseen problems.
Fortunately they both require similar board infrastructure with DDR2 and PCIe southbridge leading to a basic design/boardspec that could be modified easily to use the other processor respectively.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Germany
A nice µATX Board with such a CPU would be nice but like always - there is no desktop market for such a device. Everything is x86 related. :(

_________________
..:: www.djbase.de ::..


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:08 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Germany
I would buy one, immediately. Also a PWRficient, but the 8641D is available, now ;)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:34 am
Posts: 130
Location: Bielefeld, FRG
Quote:
I would buy one, immediately. Also a PWRficient, but the 8641D is available, now ;)
Isn't it available in samples only yet? Nothing against Freescale, but their speed of pushing new products to market is not - cough - the fastest of the industry...
Anyway, that first 8641D impression sounds promising. I hope Freescae roll it out soon and - even more important - roll it out with a *competetive* price tag.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC-06:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
PowerDeveloper.org: Copyright © 2004-2012, Genesi USA, Inc. The Power Architecture and Power.org wordmarks and the Power and Power.org logos and related marks are trademarks and service marks licensed by Power.org.
All other names and trademarks used are property of their respective owners. Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group